Skip to main content
· 11/25/1985

Robert J. Will, Cross-Appellees v. Comprehensive Accounting Corporation, Cross

Citations

  • 776 F.2d 665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contract between a franchisor and a franchisee that ties data processing to franchise rights satisfies the concerted action requirement
  • reversing a jury verdict on a tying claim for a failure to prove defendant had market power
  • no uniqueness argument unless plaintiff shows barrier preventing rivals from offering same package at same cost
  • “A tie within the meaning of antitrust depends on showing that the buyer did not want to take both products No. 18-2852 129 from the same vendor.”
  • the “voluntary pur- chase of two products together” is “not a tie at all”
  • “[T]he substantive theory of tying law depends on coercion to take two products as a package”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.