In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram) Antitrust Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs’ complaint was inconsistent with Rule 8 pleading standards because it neglected to identify the states under whose law they brought their unjust enrichment claims
• explaining that reasonable interchangeability of use and cross-elasticity of demand are concepts traditionally important in section 2 cases where “definition of the ‘relevant market’ is key”
• finding that a claim under New York's consumer protection statute \should be assessed with reference to [the] AGC factors\
• observing that price fixing is “likely to offend public policy[,]” as reflected by statutes proscribing anticompet-itive activity
• finding sufficient allegations that “defendants engaged in ‘unfair or deceptive’ acts or practices, which ‘mis[led] or deceive[d] members of the public’; and that Rhode Island consumers ‘were injured by Defendants’ actions.’ ”
• allegations that the defendants engaged price fixing \offend[s] public policy as has been established by statute and/or common law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-03-04· cited 90×
• In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2008-08-25· cited 66×
• In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 2011-03-11· cited 52×
• In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. California· 2017-03-14· cited 48×
• In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig.
  D. New Jersey· 2018-08-21· cited 38×
• In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 2014-07-03· cited 24×
• GEICO Corp. v. Autoliv, Inc.
  E.D. Michigan· 2018-08-30· cited 16×
• In re Effexor Antitrust Litig.
  D. New Jersey· 2018-11-15· cited 14×
• In re Lamictal Indirect Purchaser & Antitrust Consumer Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 2016-03-22· cited 13×
• Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO Industries
  E.D. California· 2011-02-24· cited 10×
• In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Michigan· 2014-09-25· cited 9×
• In re Effexor Antitrust Litig.
  D. New Jersey· 2018-09-18· cited 6×
• Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners
  N.D. California· 2013-08-02· cited 6×
• Time Insurance v. Astrazeneca AB
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-10-01· cited 4×
• In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litig.
  N.D. California· 2017-11-10· cited 3×

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
• United States v. Grinnell Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 2,474×
• Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-14· cited 1,009×
• Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-14· cited 783×
• Blue Shield of Va. v. McCready
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 680×
• Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
  Supreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 668×
• Todd v. Exxon Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2001-12-20· cited 361×
• Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-12-01· cited 154×
• American Ad Management, Inc. v. General Telephone Company Of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-09-09· cited 140×
• First Nationwide Savings v. Perry
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-12-03· cited 122×
• Frank J. Ostrofe v. H.S. Crocker Company, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-08-15· cited 89×
• Kanne v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2006-11-03· cited 82×
• Vinod C. Bhan, C.R.N.A. v. Nme Hospitals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Dba Manteca Hospital
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-10-02· cited 76×
• Burgert v. Lokelani Bernice Pauahi Bishop Trust
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-01-26· cited 69×
• Big Bear Lodging Ass'n v. Snow Summit, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-07-08· cited 68×
• Lorix v. Crompton Corp.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-02· cited 56×
• Intergraph Corporation v. Intel Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1999-11-05· cited 45×
• St. Patrick's Home for the Aged & Infirm v. Laticrete International, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-09-28· cited 40×
• California Emergency Physicians Medical Group v. PacifiCare
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-09-05· cited 35×