Freeman Industries, LLC v. Eastman Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[C]ourts must decide whether the alleged anticompetitive conduct affects Tennessee trade or commerce to a substantial degree.\
• “[W]e conclude that to recover for unjust enrichment, a plaintiff need not establish that the defendant received a direct benefit from the plaintiff.”
• “The plaintiff must further demonstrate that he or she has exhausted all remedies against the person with whom the plaintiff enjoyed privity of contract.”
• “[T]he legislature’s failure to express disapproval of a judicial construction of a statute is persuasive evidence of legislative adoption of the judicial construction.” (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• indirect purchaser who ultimately paid overcharge is “real” victim of antitrust violation
• outlining three elements needed to establish an unjust enrichment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).