Skip to main content

Long v. Safeway, Inc.

Citations

  • 842 F. Supp. 2d 141
  • 2012 WL 344756
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring only “giving [the plaintiff] the benefit of every reasonable inference drawn from the well-pleaded facts and allegations in the complaint” (emphasis added)
  • considering “documents, such as those attached to plaintiff’s opposition,” without converting motion into one for summary judgment
  • \The granting of Local 400's motion to dismiss based on plaintiff's failure to state a breach of duty claim necessarily defeats plaintiff's federal claim against Safeway.\
  • “A court must construe pro se filings liberally and, absent any indication of prejudice to the defendant, should read ‘all of the plaintiff’s filings together[.]’” (alteration in original) (quoting Richard v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Long v. Safeway, Inc.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.