Gwin v. NATIONAL MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASS'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a union’s failure to present a witness was not a DFR breach
• finding that the Union did not act perfunctorily when it met with the plaintiff for several hours prior to the arbitration hearing, prepared outlines of examination questions, cross-examined witnesses, and put on a supporting witness's testimony
• finding that the Union did not act perfunctorily when it met with the plaintiff for several hours prior to the arbitration hearing, prepared outlines of examination questions, cross-examined witnesses, and put on a supporting witness’s testimony
• “The duty of 29 fair representation is addressed first, because it is the ‘indispensable predicate’ to the suit against the employer.” (quoting United Parcel Serv. v. Mitchell, 451 U.S. 56, 62 (1981))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).