Charles O'Hara and Jerry Howard v. District No. 1-Pcd, Meba, Afl-Cio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court abused its discretion in issuing preliminary injunction, in part because “plaintiff employees will have an uphill battle ahead of them if they are to succeed on the claim that they are entitled to the entire award”
• explaining that an allegation that a union “refus[ed] to distribute the proceeds of the award to its rightful recipients” can “amount to a violation of the duty of fair representation”
• to extent preliminary injunction decision “hinges on questions of law,” we review it de novo (internal quotation omitted)
• to extent preliminary injunction decision “hinges on questions of law,” we review it de novo (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).