Redmon v. United States Capitol Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when an action is not presumptively adverse, such as hiring or firing, “an employee must experience materially adverse consequences affecting the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment or future employment opportunities”
• considering exhibits and affidavits filed in support of a 12(b)(6) challenge without converting to summary judgment
• applying this framework to claims of Rehabilitation Act and ADA discrimination brought under 23 the CAA
• explaining that an action such as firing is “presumptively adverse”
• stating also that the plaintiff requested mediation on July 5, 2018
• “Courts in this and other jurisdictions have repeatedly held that denial of a telework arrangement on its own does not constitute an adverse employment action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).