Nevada Supreme Court· 12/21/1988
Rembert v. State
Citations
- 766 P.2d 890
- 104 Nev. 680
- 1988 Nev. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that extrinsic evidence that the defendant was fired from a job he testified to leaving on his own terms was collateral and inadmissible when it went to the defendant's credibility rather than whether defendant committed the crime
- error to allow State to introduce immaterial extrinsic evidence of defendant’s termination from employment; the issue at trial was whether defendant had the opportunity to commit sexual assault; therefore, the extrinsic evidence was collateral
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gaxiola v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2005-09-22· cited 80×
- Greene v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-01-04· cited 71×
- Lobato v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-09-03· cited 33×
- Sherman v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1998-10-27· cited 30×
- Rowbottom v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 29×
- T.R. v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court· 2003-12-30· cited 20×
- McKee v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 17×
- Donald Sherman v. William GittereNinth Circuit· 2024-02-09· cited 8×
- In Re TRNevada Supreme Court· 2003-12-30· cited 1×
- COX v. MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLCNevada Supreme Court· 2022-04-14
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Daly v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 59×
- Deeds v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1981-04-10· cited 27×
- Washington v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 22×
- State v. DiamondNevada Supreme Court· 1928-03-06· cited 12×
- Hunt v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1976-09-17· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.