Skip to main content

Bushnell v. State

Citations

  • 599 P.2d 1038
  • 95 Nev. 570
  • 1979 Nev. LEXIS 686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that inquiry into a witness’s possible bias or motive to testify could be restricted when the inquiry was “repetitive, irrelevant, vague, speculative, or designed merely to harass, annoy or humiliate the witness”
  • providing that \the permissible extent of cross-examination is largely within the sound discretion of the trial court\
  • reviewing a district court's evidentiary ruling for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zenoff, Manoukian, Mowbray, Gunderson, Batjer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.