Skip to main content

Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'n

Citations

  • 830 A.2d 874
  • 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 536
  • 92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 809
  • 2003 WL 21982013

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting D.C. courts “have often looked to cases construing Title VII to aid [them] in construing the DCHRA”
  • listing “denial of transfer” as a potential “discrete retaliatory or discriminatory act”
  • where supervisor demeaned abilities and intelligence of women over many years, supervisor’s instructing female plaintiff within limitations period to submit to diagnostic testing at brain dysfunction center could be considered part of one unlawful employment practice
  • “a plaintiff ... has a viable hostile environment claim if [he] can demonstrate (1) that [he] is a member of a protected class [here, whistleblowing employees as defined by the WPA], (2) that [he] has been subjected to unwelcome harassment, (3
  • applying Morgan to claims under the DCHRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wagner, Terry, Steadman, Schwelb, Farrell, Ruiz, Reid, Glickman, Washington, Belson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'n

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.