Simpson v. District of Columbia Office of Human Rights

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to “retroactively require [the appellant] to have obtained a crystal ball many years earlier and to have predicted ... the development of this court’s ‘contested case’ jurisprudence”
• declining to ―retroactively require [the appellant] to have obtained a crystal ball many years earlier and to have predicted . . . the development of this court‘s ‗contested case‘ jurisprudence‖
• under the Human Rights Act, “[a]n aggrieved individual may elect to file a complaint with [the Office of Human Rights] or in any court of competent jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).