Skip to main content
· 3/11/2004

Brown v. National Academy of Sciences

Citations

  • 844 A.2d 1113
  • 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 71
  • 2004 WL 439869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that judgment as a matter of law was proper where plaintiff failed to “put on evidence of who made the decision[,] ... what it was based on, and whether it was for an impermissible purpose.... ”
  • denying application of the discovery rule in employment discrimination case
  • employees will make out a prima facie case of discrimination in hiring if they can show (1) they belong to a protected class; (2) they were qualified for the position; (3) their “failure to be hired occurred despite [their] employment qualifications;” and (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Glickman, Belson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.