Skip to main content
· 7/29/2014

Briscoe v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Citations

  • 61 F. Supp. 3d 78
  • 2014 WL 3725338
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiff’s complaint lacked cognizable legal theory because HIPAA provides no private cause of action
  • explaining that the legal standard under the DCHRA is substantially similar to the standard under Title VII
  • dismissing Title VII hostile work environment claim because the employer’s “denial of the 38 requests for days off . . . did not create an objectively hostile environment as a matter of law”
  • requests for scheduling changes “are generally outside the protections of the FMLA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.