Liu v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the applicant 13 “bears the ultimate burden” to submit corroborating evidence 14 “without prompting from the IJ”
• holding that before denying a claim solely because of an applicant’s failure to provide corroborating evidence, the agency must, either in its decision or otherwise in the record: (1
• holding that alien has burden to produce “evidence without prompting from the IJ”
• holding that “while a failure to corroborate can suffice, without more, to 12 support a finding that an alien has not met his burden of proof, a failure to 13 corroborate cannot, without more, support an adverse credibility determination”
• providing that 17 “the alien bears the ultimate burden of introducing such 18 evidence without prompting from the IJ”
• stating that “the alien bears the ultimate burden of introducing such evidence without prompting from the [Immigration Judge]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).