Jin Shui Qiu v. John Ashcroft, United States Department of Justice, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that all factual assertions in a claim must be considered unless the evidence is “too insignificant to merit discussion” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that each portion of the evidence tending to support an aspect of a claim must be considered unless it is “too insignificant to merit discussion”
• holding that the agency must consider all factual assertions and evidence supporting a factor potentially giving rise to eligibility unless the evidence supporting a factor is too insignificant to merit discussion
• holding that where an applicant gives “very spare” testimony, the fact- finder may “fairly wonder whether the testimony is 5 fabricated”
• holding that where an applicant gives “very spare” testimony, the fact-finder may “fairly wonder whether the testimony is fabricated”
• holding that all 2 factual assertions in a claim must be considered unless the 3 evidence is “too insignificant to merit discussion” (internal 4 quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).