Aden v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “Congress abrogated” prior precedent “that corroboration cannot be required from an applicant who testified credibly”
• concluding that “Congress abrogated” prior precedent “that corroboration can- not be required from an applicant who testified credibly”
• holding that the court reviews only the BIA decision where the BIA wrote its own decision and did not adopt the immigration judge’s decision
• recognizing that a noncitizen raising a due process claim for erroneous translation “must show that defects in translation prejudiced the outcome of the hearing”
• concluding that petitioner did not establish the necessary “state action” for CAT relief
• explaining that “Congress has installed a bias toward corroboration in the statute to provide greater reliability” and in doing so “made asylum litigation a little more like other litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).