Moussa Diallo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “evidence corroborating his story, or an explanation for its absence, may be required where it would reasonably be expected”
• recognizing that “consistent, detailed, and credible testimony may be sufficient to carry the alien’s burden”
• holding that minor and isolated disparities in testimony need not be fatal to credibility, especially when they do not concern material facts
• holding that minor and isolated disparities in testimony need not be fatal to credibility, especially when they do not concern material facts
• holding that an adjudicator must evaluate an asylum applicant’s reasons for failing to furnish corroborating evidence
• holding that an asylum applicant may be required to produce “evidence corroborating his story, or an explanation for its absence, ... where it would reasonably be expected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).