Ai Zhi v. Eric Holder, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an IJ must consider explanations for inconsistencies that “form the basis of an adverse credibility determination”
• explaining that the IJ must consider a petitioner’s explanation for any inconsistency that supports an adverse credibility determination
• overturning an adverse credibility finding principally based on one date-based inconsistency where the documentary evidence confirmed that it was a typographical error
• requiring an IJ to consider and address plausible and reasonable explanations for any inconsistencies
• IJ erred by not providing petitioner notice of the evidence that was required and an opportunity to explain why it might be unavailable
• IJ erred in not providing applicant notice that he was required to present corroborative evidence referred to in her decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).