Indiana Supreme Court· 12/15/1989
Light v. State
Citations
- 547 N.E.2d 1073
- 1989 Ind. LEXIS 383
- 1989 WL 155059
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court did not err by admitting defendant’s statement despite evidence of a four-hour interrogation punctuated by conduct of the interrogators involving cursing, lying, and smacking the defendant on the arm
- noting that in most cases where confessions are held involuntary, the suspects are interrogated for days, not hours
- noting that in most cases where confessions were held involuntary, the suspects were interrogated for days, not hours
- holding four-hour interrogation did not render confession involuntary; “[i]n most of the cases where the statements were held involuntary, the interrogation lasted for a matter of days, not hours”
- defendant’s statement was voluntary despite evidence of a four-hour interrogation punctuated by police conduct involving cursing, lying, and Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 41A01-1705-CR-985 | March 9, 2018 Page 7 of 9 smacking the defendant on the arm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shepard, Givan, Piyarnik, Dickson, Debruler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
- Bivins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-03-09· cited 207×
- People v. HumphreySupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-04-17· cited 203×
- Fair v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 121×
- Sweeney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-18· cited 114×
- Wilkes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-12-10· cited 99×
- Allen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-09-25· cited 97×
- Washington v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 95×
- Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 81×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-29· cited 72×
- Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 71×
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 67×
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-26· cited 65×
- Griffith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-05-16· cited 64×
- Crain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-20· cited 61×
- Tobias v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1996-05-24· cited 55×
- Angleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-09· cited 51×
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-12-21· cited 50×
- Concepcion v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1991-03-06· cited 49×
- Haviland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-03-13· cited 49×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1960-01-11· cited 1,191×
- Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 986×
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 652×
- Sims v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 561×
- Clewis v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 543×
- Loyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-01-11· cited 405×
- Tague v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 219×
- Bruce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-04-19· cited 200×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.