Skip to main content

Ross v. State

Citations

  • 676 N.E.2d 339
  • 1996 Ind. LEXIS 200
  • 1997 WL 2813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s prior bad acts are generally admissible to show the relationship between the defendant and victim
  • holding that prior misconduct was “admissible because it demonstrated the defendant’s motive and intent to commit the murder and illuminated the relationship between the defendant and victim”
  • holding that prior misconduct was “admissible because it demonstrated the defendant’s motive and intent to commit the murder and illuminated the relationship between the defendant and victim”
  • holding that prior misconduct was “admissible because it demonstrated the defendant’s motive and intent to commit the murder and illuminated the relationship between the defendant and victim”
  • holding that “the trial court should unambiguously address the defendant and leave no question that the defendant was given an opportunity to speak on his own behalf.”
  • holding that the defendant’s statements that the victim “would pay,” and threats to kill the victim made two months before the murder, were admissible under Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.