Lewis v. State
Citations
- 55 Fla. 54
Syllabus
<p>i. A count in an indictment for embezzlement found under Section 3311 of the General Statutes of 1906, which describes the property alleged to have been embezzled by the accused as “fifty dollars, good and lawful money, currency of the United States of America, a better description of said money being to the grand jurors unknown; that the said money was then and there the property of” a certain designated person “and was of the value of fifty dollars,” sufficiently describes the property to withstand an attack made by amotion to quash upon that ground.</p> <p>2. A count in an indictment for embezzlement found under Section 33x1 of the General Statutes of 1906 which charges that the property alleged to have been embezzled had come into the custody and control of the accused 1 ‘by reason and by virtue of his being the agent and servant of” a certain designated person is not open to attack by a motion to quash because it fails to “allege in what capacity the defendant was acting as agent and servant in this connection.” Such statute prescribes the same penalty for the offense of embezzlement when committed by an agent as when committed by a servant of another, and because an indictment in a single count describes the offender as occupying both positions conjunctively that of agent and servant, at the time of the commission of the offense does not render it bad for uncertainty, for in such a casebutone offenceischargedandtheprosecutorisatlibertyto prove either or both of the capacities in which the defendant acted at the time of committing the offense, and if either or both of such capacities were proven, together with the other ingredients of the offense, the crime would be made out,</p> <p>3. It is the policy of this court, as it evidently was of the Legislature in enacting Sections 3961 and 3962 of the General Statutes of 1906, to uphold indictiryents and informations whenever there has been a substantial compliance with the: law therein.</p> <p>4. In an indictmen
Judges: Shackleford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montsdoca v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-07-03· cited 72×
- North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1952-10-21· cited 51×
- In re RobinsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-05-14· cited 48×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 47×
- Putnal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 44×
- Hoopes v. CraneSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 44×
- Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 44×
- Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 39×
- Pensacola Electric Co. v. BissettSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 33×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-04-27· cited 31×
- Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-11-08· cited 30×
- Kellum v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-06-24· cited 29×
- McMillan v. WarrenSupreme Court of Florida· 1910-01-15· cited 25×
- Seward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1952-06-13· cited 23×
- Tully v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-06-03· cited 22×
- Tillman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 21×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-12-12· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Stillman v. MerrittSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-07-14· cited 21×
- Barrentine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-06-13· cited 19×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. DeesSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-06-15· cited 16×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 120×
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 113×
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 82×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 81×
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 58×
- State v. McDonald.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1903-11-03· cited 45×
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 44×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 41×
- Lindsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 36×
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 30×
- Blount v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-06-15· cited 25×
- Richburger v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1907-03-15· cited 25×
- Barber v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 24×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 23×
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-01-15· cited 22×
- Platt v. RowandSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 20×
- Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-01-15· cited 19×
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 17×
- Lang v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 15×
- Eatman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-06-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.