State v. McDonald.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen an act is forbidden by law to be done, the intent to do the act is the criminal intent and the law presumes the intent from the commission of the act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lewis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 65×
• State v. Ward
  Washington Supreme Court· 1917-06-04· cited 6×
• State v. Dunn.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1905-05-16· cited 3×
• State v. Horne
  Utah Supreme Court· 1923-11-08· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McLean
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1897-09-05· cited 22×
• Beaty v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1882-05-15· cited 13×
• State v. . Wolf
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1898-04-19· cited 12×
• People v. Hurst
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1886-07-01· cited 10×