Lang v. State
Citations
- 42 Fla. 595
Syllabus
<p>1. An indictment for larceny under Section 2440, Revised Statutes, in proper form and found to be a true bill by a grand jury in a court having jurisdiction of the subject-matter, properly signed, endorsed and presented as required by statute, and describing the property alleged to have been stolen as one hundred dollars, of the currency of the United States of America, the denomination of which was to the grand jurors unknown, of the property of a named person, is not so defective in reference to the description of the property as to amount to- no indictment.</p> <p>2. In criminal pleading the omission to state some matters of description, not essential constituents of an offence, but which are required to be stated if known, may be excused by an allegation that they were unknown to the indicting grand jury, and this rule applies to the description of property in indictments for larceny.</p> <p>3. Whether the allegation in an indictment for larceny of a want of more perfect knowledge of the description of the property alleged to have been stolen is subject to enquiry before the trial jury, need not be considered in a case where there is no evidence that the grand jury was in possession of information that would enable them to give a better description.</p> <p>4. The trial court should not by any arbitrary standard direct the jury thereby to weigh and estimate the testimony of a defendant who takes the stand as a witness.</p> <p>5. A’ request to charge on behalf of a defendant who. testifies in his defence that the jury have no right to disregard his testimony on the ground alone that he is the defendant in the case, is properly refused, especially where the court instructs the jury fully as to how they should weigh the testimony of witnesses generally.</p> <p>6; In an indictment for grand larceny under a statute providing that if the property stolen is of the value of twenty dollars or more the offence shall be grand larceny, and if the value is less than twenty
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BeazleySupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 113×
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 65×
- Strobhar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 40×
- Tirko v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-03-01· cited 34×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-06-15· cited 34×
- Easterlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 16×
- Keigans v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 12×
- Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 9×
- Enson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 9×
- Ingleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-26· cited 6×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-12-20· cited 6×
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-01-15· cited 5×
- Volusia County Bank v. BertolaSupreme Court of Florida· 1902-06-15· cited 5×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex parte PrinceSupreme Court of Florida· 1891-01-15· cited 49×
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1893-01-31· cited 35×
- People v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-09-18· cited 32×
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri· 1884-10-15· cited 26×
- Hamilton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1877-11-15· cited 20×
- McQueen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-05-15· cited 18×
- State v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1849-07-01· cited 17×
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-06-15· cited 16×
- Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1886-06-15· cited 13×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1892-10-04· cited 11×
- People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-10-04· cited 7×
- Hart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1877-05-15· cited 6×
- Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1890-01-15· cited 5×
- State v. GastingSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1871-07-15· cited 3×
- State v. HobbsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1893-11-09· cited 3×
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1884-06-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.