Tillman v. State
Citations
- 58 Fla. 113
Syllabus
<p>1. Assuming that the defendant in a prosecution against him for crime could by appropriate! action in the trial court in the way of pleas, objections or otherwise have raised the question as to the authority and jurisdiction of the judge of the Criminal Court of Record for another county to preside over the court in the trial of such case, where such judge is acting under an order of the Governor, based upon section 3871 of the General Statutes of 1906, where no objections to the authority or jurisdiction of such judge were made in the trial court and no action of any kindi taken by the defendant toward raising such question, he will be deemed to have waived by his silence any such privilege or right he may have had, and will not be permitted to raise such question for the first time in the appellate court.</p> <p>2. No error is made to appear in overruling a motion to quash certain counts in an information, based upon section 3476 of the General Statutes of 1906, charging the defendant with the crime of bribery of a judicial officer, when such information substantially complied with the requirements of such statute. Such information is not fatally defective when it distinctly alleges that the defendant offered' the bribe to the judge of a designated court for the purpose of and in order to influence him “to modify and reduce the sentence” imposed upon a certain named defendant on a prior day of the same term of court, because it does not affirmatively allege that the prosecution against such convicted defendant was still pending in such court at the time such bribe was offered.</p> <p>3. The right of a defendant to make a motion for a new trial, within the time provided by law, is not forfeited by the fact that sentence had been pronounced upon the defendant prior to the making of such motion.</p> <p>4. During the same term of court at which tho'sentence is imposed, before the defendant had begun serving such sentence, the trial judge has the power to modify suc
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Troupe v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-05· cited 123×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-12-22· cited 94×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-04-27· cited 31×
- State v. GriffithSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-06-13· cited 26×
- Barrentine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-06-13· cited 19×
- Brunson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-19· cited 11×
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-01-15· cited 4×
- Hoglan v. GeddesWyoming Supreme Court· 1918-04-22· cited 4×
- Nell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-09-06· cited 4×
- Tobler v. BeckettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-06-26· cited 2×
- Pruitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-03-19· cited 2×
- Williams v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida· 1962-05-31
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 82×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 81×
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 65×
- Ozburn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1891-04-24· cited 48×
- State v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1890-09-05· cited 43×
- State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri· 1892-03-28· cited 36×
- Schlungger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1888-02-09· cited 28×
- Barber v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 24×
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PrestonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1901-12-07· cited 19×
- Douglass v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-01-15· cited 12×
- Massey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 8×
- Finley v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.