Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/5/1993

Leon v. Murphy

Citations

  • 988 F.2d 303
  • 1993 WL 57781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a complaint that contains only conclusory, vague or general allegations cannot withstand a motion to dismiss
  • stating that summary judgment is only appropriate where, “after drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought, no reasonable trier of fact could find in favor of the non-moving party.”
  • stating that summary judgment is only appropriate where, “after drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought, no reasonable trier of fact could find in favor of the non-moving party”
  • stating that summary judgment is only appropriate where, “after drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought, no reasonable trier of fact could find in favor of the non-moving party”
  • affirming dismissal of § 1983 claim as time-barred because it accrued on the date notice was mailed
  • “A [§ 1983] complaint containing only conclusory, vague, or general allegations of conspiracy to deprive a person of constitutional rights cannot withstand a motion to dismiss.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graafeiland, Mahoney, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.