Petrosky v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the most important precedential authority presented is from the Second Circuit as this Court is bound by its decisions of law.”
• stating that “the most important precedential authority presented is from the Second Circuit as this Court is bound by its decisions of law”
• “Other courts have rejected the contention that co-worker harassment was done under color of law ‘when the harassment did not involve use of state authority or position.’”
• “Negative comments directed at a person’s disability can, when combined with other evidence, support an inference that the adverse employment action was taken on the basis of the employee’s disability.”
• “[T]he legal standard which governs claims of sexual harassment based on a hostile work environment under Title VII also governs such claims asserted under . . . the Equal Protection Clause.” (citations omitted)
• defendant personally involved where defendant gave plaintiff oral examination during job interview

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).