Riverwoods Chappaqua Corp. And Harvey Shapiro v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a group allegedly consisting of a corporation and two of its employees could not \conduct\ the corporation itself as the RICO enterprise
• noting that “the person and the enterprise referred to must be distinct” to satisfy Section 1962
• noting that “the person and the enterprise referred to must be distinct” to satisfy Section 1962
• noting that the distinctness requirement “does not foreclose the possibility of a corporate entity being held liable as a defendant under section 1962(c) where it associates with others to form an enterprise that is sufficiently distinct from itself”
• dismissing RICO claim where alleged associated-in-fact enterprise merely carried on the business of one of the entities allegedly comprising the association-in-fact
• noting requirement of due diligence where plaintiff relies on fraudulent concealment to toll RICO limitations period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).