Frank D. Jones v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs and New York State Army National Guard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a district court may properly deny leave when amendment would be futile.”
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment .bars § 1983 suits against state agencies
• finding that “the proposed amendment was futile” because the “proposed amended complaint would be subject to immediate dismissal”
• finding that “the proposed amendment was futile” because the “proposed amended complaint would be subject to immediate dismissal”
• finding that “the proposed amendment was futile” because the “proposed amended complaint would be subject to immediate dismissal”
• finding that amendments subject to “immediate dismissal” for failure to state a claim are “futile” and should not be allowed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).