Skip to main content
· 3/2/1999

Manuel O. Adames v. United States

Citations

  • 171 F.3d 728
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3165
  • 1999 WL 101442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment for government despite fact that forfeiture was preceded by inadequate notice where claimant's plea allocution established currency's forfeitability
  • quoting, inter alia, Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977)
  • “A criminal defendant’s self-inculpatory statements made under oath at his plea allocution ... are generally treated as conclusive in the face of the defendant’s later attempt to contradict them.” (citation omitted)
  • “A criminal defendant’s self-inculpatory statements made under oath at his plea allocution . . . are generally treated as conclusive in the face of the defendant’s later attempt to contradict them.” (citation omitted)
  • “A criminal defendant’s self-inculpatory statements made under oath at his plea allocution . . . are generally treated as conclusive in the face of the defendant’s later attempt to contradict them.” (citation omitted)
  • actor attempted to use money to purchase drugs from an undercover agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Cabranes, Noonan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.