Hudson Hotels Corporation v. Choice Hotels International, and Robert Hazard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing, in dicta, the notion that a new product idea cannot, as a matter of law, constitute a trade secret
• opining that novelty is mixed question of law and fact
• “Once [plaintiffs product was marketed], it could not constitute a. protectible trade secret because, from that time forward, it could not be used secretly and continuously in its business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).