Skip to main content
· 7/11/2002

Lebrun v. England

Citations

  • 212 F. Supp. 2d 5
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14903
  • 2002 WL 1839227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “inconsistencies” between draft declarations prepared by the BCNR investigator was insufficient for a finding of bad faith warranting additional discovery
  • holding plaintiff’s statement was insufficient to rebut presumption of regularity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.