John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1552(a)(1) “substantially restrict[s] the authority of the reviewing court to upset the Secretary’s determination”
• holding that APA review of Board’s decision permits “determin[ation] only [of] whether the [Board’s] decision making process was deficient, not whether [its] decision was correct”
• holding that the Secretary “must give a reason that a court can measure . . . against the ‘arbitrary or capricious’ standard of the APA”
• holding that the Secretary “must give a reason that a court can measure ... against the ‘arbitrary or capricious’ standard of the APA”
• holding that the district court erred by dismissing a claim challenging the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records’ denial as arbitrary and capricious under the APA
• holding that in exercising its discretion in regard to promotion decisions, the military must “give a reason that a court can measure, albeit with due deference, against the arbitrary and capricious standard of the APA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).