D. Nevada· 11/18/1985
Laxalt v. McClatchy
Citations
- 622 F. Supp. 737
- 12 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1377
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a senator’s use of Senate stationery to demand a retraction in a news story did not transform the senator’s action into action taken under color of federal law for purposes of a Bivens claim
- wholly owned subsidiaries have no separate legal existence for civil conspiracy claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Holt Oil & Gas Corporation and Faywin Investments, Pty. Ltd., Plaintiffs-Counter v. Ralph L. Harvey, Defendant-CounterFifth Circuit· 1986-10-08· cited 242×
- Johnson v. KnowlesNinth Circuit· 1997-05-21· cited 150×
- Myron S. Gritchen v. Gordon W. CollierNinth Circuit· 2001-06-13· cited 142×
- Posadas v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court· 1993-05-07· cited 113×
- DeVaney v. Thriftway Marketing Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-12-22· cited 89×
- Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1988-06-03· cited 63×
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.D. Kansas· 1990-05-11· cited 63×
- Berkshire Investments, LLC v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court· 2012-06-01· cited 50×
- In re: Robert R. Black and Kelly J. Black Michael Allen ChernineNinth Circuit· 2013-02-11· cited 49×
- Nanopierce Technologies, Inc. v. Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.Nevada Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 42×
- Rashidi v. AlbrightD. Nevada· 1993-02-10· cited 38×
- Buckley v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.D. New Hampshire· 1991-04-17· cited 28×
- General Acquisition, Inc. v. GenCorp Inc.S.D. Ohio· 1990-05-25· cited 23×
- Dutt v. KrempNevada Supreme Court· 1995-04-27· cited 21×
- Spear v. Town of West HartfordD. Connecticut· 1991-04-17· cited 21×
- Abbott v. United Venture Capital, Inc.D. Nevada· 1989-05-22· cited 12×
- Munley v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court· 1988-09-21· cited 12×
- Dutt v. KrempNevada Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 10×
- Rebel Van Lines v. City of ComptonC.D. California· 1987-06-25· cited 10×
- Stamp v. Inamed Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1991-10-18· cited 9×
Cites
73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court· 1961-02-20· cited 4,784×
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaSecond Circuit· 1982-03-29· cited 4,631×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 3,198×
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,039×
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court· 1977-06-24· cited 2,976×
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 2,910×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 2,202×
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,640×
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1952-03-03· cited 1,544×
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1977-07-13· cited 1,092×
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 1,085×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.