Berkshire Investments, LLC v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that those claims which were ripe and “made known to [the plaintiffs]” were precluded in the second suit
• stating, \such claims are barred by res judicata whether actually raised in the prior litigation or not.\
• finding attorneys in privity with clients when attorneys were sued in second suit “solely for their alleged conduct” in representing the clients
• finding that a party is in privity for purposes of preclusion where “their only interest in the present action arose from their representation of former clients in the former action, and they were named solely for their alleged conduct in that capacity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).