Holt Oil & Gas Corporation and Faywin Investments, Pty. Ltd., Plaintiffs-Counter v. Ralph L. Harvey, Defendant-Counter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \communications [to Texas] in the course of developing and carrying out the contract was in itself ... insufficient to constitute purposeful availment\ where \the contract was centered in Oklahoma\
• holding that “communications [to Texas] in the course of developing and carrying out the contract was in itself . . . insufficient to constitute purposeful availment” where “the contract was centered in Oklahoma”
• concluding that the significance of the contractual relationship between the nonresident defendant and the Texas plaintiff was undermined by the fact that the performance of the contract was centered in Oklahoma rather than Texas
• holding that there was no specific jurisdiction in Texas over a non- resident corporation that (i) entered into a contract with a Texas corporation, (ii) sent a final contract agreement from Oklahoma to Texas, (iii
• holding that defendant was not subject to specific jurisdiction where nonresident defendant entered into a contract with a Texas resident, sent an agreement and checks to Texas, and engaged in extensive telephonic and written communications with the plaintiff in Texas
• holding that defendant was not subject to specific jurisdiction where nonresident defendant entered into a contract with a Texas resident, sent an agreement and checks to Texas, and engaged in extensive telephonic and written communications with the plaintiff in Texas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).