Laxalt v. McClatchy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a senator’s use of Senate stationery to demand a retraction in a news story did not transform the senator’s action into action taken under color of federal law for purposes of a Bivens claim
• wholly owned subsidiaries have no separate legal existence for civil conspiracy claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).