Skip to main content

Larson v. Larson

Citations

  • 373 N.W.2d 287
  • 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that foreseeability “was clear and should have been decided by the court as a matter of law” when the only evidence of foreseeability was a vague comment by an intoxicated person 2 months before the injury
  • “In this case, the issue is whether the criminal act of arson was sufficiently foreseeable to impose the duty to warn on appellant”
  • when unidentified person had threatened to “get” a police officer’s house, police officer had no duty to warn brother of possible danger of arson when brother was house-sitting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelley, Yetka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Larson v. Larson

62 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.