Massachusetts Appeals Court· 3/7/1990
Larson v. Larson
Citations
- 551 N.E.2d 43
- 28 Mass. App. Ct. 338
- 1990 Mass. App. LEXIS 122
- 1990 WL 25283
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “to find a defendant in civil contempt there must be a clear and unequivocal command and an equally clear and undoubted disobedience”
- in order to find a defendant in civil contempt there must be a clear and unequivocal command and an equally clear and undoubted disobedience
- \[I]n order to find a defendant in civil contempt there must be a clear and unequivocal command and an equally clear and undoubted disobedience\
- \defendant must be found to have the ability to pay at the time the contempt judgment enters\
- \the defendant must be found to have the ability to pay at the time the contempt judgment enters\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Kaplan, Warner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bercume v. BercumeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-01-12· cited 37×
- Larson v. LarsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-04-01· cited 35×
- Larson v. LarsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-07-28· cited 31×
- Parrish v. ParrishMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-02-05· cited 30×
- Premier Insurance v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-12-15· cited 23×
- Keville v. McKeeverMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-01-31· cited 20×
- Buckley v. BuckleyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-05-28· cited 20×
- Ruml v. RumlMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-11-21· cited 20×
- D.L. v. G.L.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-07-16· cited 20×
- Poras v. PaulingMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-10-19· cited 20×
- Sax v. SaxMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-02-15· cited 17×
- Whelan v. FrisbeeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-07-27· cited 13×
- El Chaar v. ChehabMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-12-31· cited 13×
- Tatar v. SchukerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-10-09· cited 11×
- Rostanzo v. RostanzoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-01-29· cited 10×
- Bisienere v. BuccinoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-07-05· cited 9×
- Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-05-10· cited 8×
- T.M. v. L.H.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-02-12· cited 7×
- Krapf v. KrapfMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-07-19· cited 7×
- Caveney v. CaveneyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2012-01-12· cited 7×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Furtado v. FurtadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-03-14· cited 84×
- DeRose v. Putnam Management Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-08-12· cited 84×
- Santa Maria v. TrottoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-06-28· cited 56×
- Nickerson v. DowdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-04-27· cited 49×
- Pemberton v. PembertonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-01-03· cited 37×
- Feakes v. BozyczkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-11-10· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. RancourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-02-18· cited 34×
- Kennedy v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-06-15· cited 20×
- Kotler v. SpauldingMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-07-22· cited 19×
- Regina Grape Products Co. v. SUPREME WINE CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-06-11· cited 18×
- Olmstead v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-03-03· cited 18×
- Turner v. McCuneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1976-12-15· cited 14×
- Hinds v. HindsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1976-02-05· cited 9×
- Kirwood v. KirwoodMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-06-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.