Larson v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the celebration of marriage is shown, the contract of marriage, the capacity of the parties, and, in fact, everything necessary to the validity of the marriage, in the absence of proof to the contrary, will be presumed ***.”
• “When the celebration of marriage is shown, the contract of marriage, the capacity of the parties, and, in fact, everything necessary to the validity of the marriage, in the absence of proof to the contrary, will be presumed ***.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pape v. Byrd
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-09-26· cited 11×
• In re Estate of McDonald
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-02-01· cited 8×
• Payton v. Payne
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-11-18· cited 7×
• In re Estate of McDonald
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2022-04-21· cited 7×
• In Re Marriage of Kutchins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-07-15· cited 6×
• In Re Marriage of May
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-03-18· cited 5×
• In Re Driskell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-24· cited 3×
• Pape v. Byrd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-24· cited 3×
• In Re Marriage of Davis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-06-27· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Flynn v. Troesch.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1940-02-13· cited 21×
• Ertel v. Ertel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1942-02-24· cited 8×