Larson v. Larson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where husband’s employer cancelled the policy covered by the decree and the husband later acquired an individual policy naming his second wife as the beneficiary, the principles of equity were not violated by allowing the second wife to recover on the policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tupper v. Roan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-11-12· cited 28×
• Livoti v. Aycock
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-11-05· cited 18×
• Aetna Life Insurance v. Weekes
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-04-04· cited 15×
• Brooks v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1971-05-06· cited 14×
• Curtis v. Curtis
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-04-24· cited 14×
• Crozier v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-02-01· cited 10×
• Gray v. Higgins
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-07-16· cited 9×
• Zobrist v. Bennison
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-06-30· cited 7×
• Taylor v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1975-11-24· cited 7×
• Weiner v. Goldberg
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-09-12· cited 7×
• In Re Estate of Belcher
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-18· cited 7×
• Whitehead v. Whitehead
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-04-14· cited 5×
• Pernick v. Brandt
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-08-24· cited 5×
• Pope v. Skipper
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-11-14· cited 4×