Lundgren v. Fultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• psychiatrist owed duty to third party where patient threatens foreseeable harm to that party and psychiatrist has the ability to control the risk of harm
• “Even if the ability to control another’s conduct exists, there is no duty to control that person unless the harm is foreseeable.”
• \Implicit in the duty to control is the ability to control.\
• one and one-half years not too remote
• one and one-half years not too remote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).