Massachusetts Appeals Court· 4/1/1991
Larson v. Larson
Citations
- 569 N.E.2d 406
- 30 Mass. App. Ct. 418
- 1991 Mass. App. LEXIS 214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dealing with claim preclusion regarding continuing monthly payment obligation under divorce judgment
- “a Probate Court judge has no authority under G. L. c. 208, § 28, to make support orders for a child over twenty-one”
- “later violations [by defendant of monthly payment obligations pursuant to divorce agreement] were not and could not have been raised in the original action because the times for payment had not yet occurred or given rise to any cause of action in favor of [plaintiff]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Fine, Laurence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoS.D. New York· 2016-01-26· cited 197×
- Cameron v. CarelliMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-08-10· cited 90×
- Blanchette v. School Committee of WestwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-04-06· cited 79×
- DaLuz v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-04-25· cited 75×
- Adoption of KimberlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-03-09· cited 64×
- Fay v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-03-23· cited 50×
- Pemstein v. StimpsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-03-28· cited 48×
- Correia v. DeSimoneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-06-18· cited 35×
- Larson v. LarsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-07-28· cited 31×
- Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-10-13· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. GravesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-07-30· cited 23×
- A.H. v. M.P.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-12-08· cited 21×
- Ruml v. RumlMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-11-21· cited 20×
- Eccleston v. BankoskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-01-13· cited 15×
- Tatar v. SchukerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-10-09· cited 11×
- Heider v. HeiderMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-06-22· cited 10×
- Bisienere v. BuccinoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-07-05· cited 9×
- Zizza v. ZizzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-30· cited 9×
- Care and Protection of IsabelleMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1992-11-10· cited 8×
- Chambers v. Lemuel Shattuck HospitalMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-08-26· cited 8×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heacock v. HeacockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-03-22· cited 219×
- Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1958-10-30· cited 148×
- Cousineau v. LarameeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-04-21· cited 94×
- Davidson v. DavidsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-02-20· cited 90×
- Bagley v. MoxleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-06-13· cited 73×
- Brown v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-02-14· cited 55×
- Larson v. LarsonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-03-07· cited 44×
- Burger Chef Systems, Inc. v. Servfast of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-11-13· cited 32×
- Hastoupis v. GargasMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-01-10· cited 29×
- Phelps v. Shawprint, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1952-02-01· cited 21×
- Brash v. BrashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-03-20· cited 21×
- Kotler v. SpauldingMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-07-22· cited 19×
- Dunbar v. DunbarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1901-12-31· cited 18×
- Turner v. McCuneMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1976-12-15· cited 14×
- Moat v. DucharmeMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-06-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.