Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 878 S.W.2d 164
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 77
  • 1994 WL 259068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is “axiomatic that in order to preserve an error in the admission of evidence for appellate review, a defendant must make a timely objection”
  • stating that it is “axiomatic that in order to preserve an error in the admission of evidence for appellate review, a defendant must make a timely objection”
  • stating that it is A axiomatic that in order to preserve an error in the admission of evidence for appellate review, a defendant must make a timely objection @
  • \[A] complaint is not waived as to evidence which is properly admitted but for which the ground of inadmissibility later arises.\
  • “[A] complaint is not waived as to evidence which is properly admitted but for which the ground of inadmissibility later arises.”
  • \[A] complaint is not waived as to evidence which is properly admitted but for which the ground of inadmissibility later arises.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.