Skip to main content

Young v. State

Citations

  • 137 S.W.3d 65
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 933
  • 2004 WL 1259872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because an instruction to disregard venireperson's comments would have cured any resulting harm, trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for mistrial
  • concluding that a timely instruction to disregard statement by venire member during voir dire would have cured any prejudice
  • holding that because an instruction to disregard venireperson'scomments wouldhave curedany resulting harm, trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for mistrial
  • concluding that when party fails to seek curative instruction and requests only mistrial, scope of review is limited to whether trial court erred in denying mistrial
  • concluding that when party fails to seek curative instruction and requests only mistrial, scope of review is limited to whether trial court erred in denying mistrial
  • concluding that an instruction to disregard would have been sufficient in a case where the venire panel had “minimal information” about the venireperson who made a prejudicial remark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, Keller, Keasler, Heryey, Holcomb, Cochran, Meyers, Price, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

464 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.