Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 3/1/2010
Kurstin v. Bromberg Rosenthal, LLP
Citations
- 990 A.2d 594
- 191 Md. App. 124
- 2010 Md. App. LEXIS 32
- 2010 WL 682265
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a discovery order adverse to the attorney-client privilege was not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine or the categorical exclusion of Mohawk Industries
- outlining the development of the collateral order doctrine and its introduction to Maryland law
- “Maryland first adopted the collateral order doctrine in the opinion of Judge Orth for the Court of Appeals in Jolley v. State”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meredith, Graeff, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-24· cited 18×
- Doe v. Sovereign Grace Ministries, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-06-26· cited 10×
- Kurstin v. Bromberg Rosenthal, LLPCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-12· cited 10×
- In re C.E.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-10-20· cited 9×
- Cabrera v. MercadoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-28· cited 6×
- In the Matter of Williams Revocable TrustCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-11-01· cited 4×
- Adams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-02-08· cited 2×
- In re: D.M., J.M.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-05-25· cited 2×
- Buzbee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-07· cited 1×
- Norman v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-10-28
- In re: Trust Under Item TenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2024-07-31
- In re: O.RG.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-10-31
Cites
69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,269×
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court· 1995-03-01· cited 1,403×
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 1,372×
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 989×
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 964×
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court· 2009-12-08· cited 931×
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 910×
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 814×
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 667×
- Will v. HallockSupreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 526×
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 447×
- Hearn v. RhayE.D. Washington· 1975-09-26· cited 364×
- Lauro Lines S.R.L. v. ChasserSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 268×
- Rohrbeck v. RohrbeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-06· cited 173×
- Schultz v. PrittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-16· cited 132×
- Shoemaker v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-03-10· cited 112×
- Clark v. ElzaCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-23· cited 103×
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-08-05· cited 99×
Other cases named Kurstin v. Bromberg Rosenthal, LLP
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.