Supreme Court· 12/8/2009

Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter

Citations

558 U.S. 100
130 S. Ct. 599
175 L. Ed. 2d 458
2009 U.S. LEXIS 8942
29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1761
78 U.S.L.W. 4019
54 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 667
22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a party may not bring an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a claim of attorney-client privilege
holding that, to determine the applicability of the collateral order doctrine, the inquiry should focus on “the entire category to which a claim belongs” (citation and punctuation omitted)
holding that the third factor for the collateral order doctrine is not satisfied if the non-party can stand in contempt and appeal from that ruling
holding that discovery orders, including privilege- related rulings, generally do not qualify for immediate appeal under the collateral-order doctrine
holding that discovery orders, including privilege- related rulings, generally do not qualify for immediate appeal under the collateral-order doctrine
holding that all disclosure orders adverse to the attorney-client privilege are not immediately appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor, Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Thomas, Ii-C

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

510 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.