· 1/18/2006
Will v. Hallock
Citations
- 546 U.S. 345
- 126 S. Ct. 952
- 163 L. Ed. 2d 836
- 2006 U.S. LEXIS 911
- 2006 WL 119141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[W]e have not mentioned applying the collateral order doctrine recently without emphasizing its modest scope.\
- “[The] rule of respecting a prior judgment by giving a defense against relitigation has not been thought to protect values so great that only immediate appeal can effectively vindicate them.”
- so holding with respect to the Federal Tort Claims Act’s judg- ment bar
- “And we have meant what we have said”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Souter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.