Skip to main content
· 1/18/2006

Will v. Hallock

Citations

  • 546 U.S. 345
  • 126 S. Ct. 952
  • 163 L. Ed. 2d 836
  • 2006 U.S. LEXIS 911
  • 2006 WL 119141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[W]e have not mentioned applying the collateral order doctrine recently without emphasizing its modest scope.\
  • “[The] rule of respecting a prior judgment by giving a defense against relitigation has not been thought to protect values so great that only immediate appeal can effectively vindicate them.”
  • so holding with respect to the Federal Tort Claims Act’s judg- ment bar
  • “And we have meant what we have said”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Souter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.