Skip to main content
· 6/6/1994

Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.

Citations

  • 511 U.S. 863
  • 114 S. Ct. 1992
  • 128 L. Ed. 2d 842
  • 1994 U.S. LEXIS 4273
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 399
  • 8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 193
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4099
  • 31 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1010
  • 62 U.S.L.W. 4457
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 7638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that order vacating dis- missal is not appealable collateral order even when parties negotiated for immunity to suit
  • holding that order vacating dis- missal is not appealable collateral order even when parties negotiated for immunity to suit
  • holding that a lower court’s refusal to enforce a settlement agreement against a plaintiff ’s claims was not a collateral order
  • holding that denial of special motion to strike under Oregon’s. anti-SLAPP statute was not immediately appealable where Oregon statute did not provide for immediate appellate review of such order
  • holding that denial of special motion to strike under Oregon’s anti-SLAPP statute was not immediately appealable where Oregon statute did not provide for immediate appellate review of such order
  • noting that exceptions to the general rule permitting a single appeal are to be interpreted narrowly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Souter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.