Skip to main content
· 12/6/1989

Rohrbeck v. Rohrbeck

Citations

  • 566 A.2d 767
  • 318 Md. 28
  • 11 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2253
  • 1989 Md. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred in dismissing a former spouse’s application for a QDRO for past-due maintenance and child support
  • holding that the circuit court’s judgment was final only when the QDRO, “the last unresolved claim in the action[,]” was completed
  • holding that the trial court erred in dismissing a former spouse's application for a QDRO for past-due maintenance and child support
  • holding that a spouse may enforce a previously entered judgment in a divorce action by obtaining a QDRO
  • noting that an order is not a final judgment if it does not “adjudicate or complete the adjudication of all claims against all parties”
  • noting that the question for finality is whether the trial court’s ruling or order was intended as “an unqualified, final disposition of the matter in controversy” that “le[ft] nothing more to be done in order to effectuate the court’s disposition of the matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Wilner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.