Skip to main content

Eaton v. State

Citations

  • 894 N.E.2d 213
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 2107
  • 2008 WL 4367871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant did not waive his statutory right to counsel at his probation revocation proceeding because he did not make an unequivocal waiver and was not properly advised of his right to counsel
  • concluding counsel was not waived and the defendant was not adequately advised as to the consequences of waiver
  • reversing and remanding when probationer received inadequate advisements during the probation revocation hearing and therefore did not waive the right to counsel voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently
  • distinguishing Greer, below, holding that a judge’s inquiry during a probation revocation hearing was insufficient where the defendant’s waiver was equivocal and the defendant had admitted some allegations without receiving advisements or a determination of competency
  • distinguishing Greer, below, holding that a judge's inquiry during a probation revocation hearing was insufficient where the defendant's waiver was equivocal and the defendant had admitted some allegations without receiving advisements or a determination of competency
  • a waiver of counsel during a probation revocation hearing must be made knowingly and voluntarily

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Bradford, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.